Ahmadi Muslim Mubahila Challenge (Urdu)

Duration: 2 : 29

Description: Saira One such opponent was Maulvi Mahmood Ahmad Mirpuri of Birmingham. He was the leader of Ahl-e-Hadith in Britain and the editor of Sirat-e- Mustaqeem, a monthly magazine, which often published articles against Ahmadiyyat. He wrote a long letter to the Daily Jang on 7th March, 1985, in which he gave the impression that the Promised Messiah issued the challenge to Maulvi Sanaullah in 1907. He said that the Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad wrote to Maulvi Sanaullah in Sanaullah, "If I am a liar and an impostor as you always brand me in your journal Ahl-e-Hadith then I will die in your lifetime." From this he inferred that the Promised Messiah died due to Mubahala in 1908. The fact was that Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad issued the challenge in 1897, and Maulvi Sanaulllah did not respond to this challenge for ten years. Again Maulvi Mahmood Mirpuri tried to mislead the public by not disclosing all those statements and writings of Maulvi Sanaullah in which he had not only avoided the challenge, but also clearly stated that he was not going to accept the challenge. Making this false statement, the said Maulana in his letter even issued a challenge Mubahala to Hazrat Mirza Tahir Ahmad so as to resolve the dispute forever. (see Jang, London, 7th March 1985) On the 10th of June, however, when Imam Jamaat Ahmadiyya issued the challenge of Mubahala to all chief opponents, a copy of that was sent to the Maulvi Mahmood Mirpuri. Like his leader Maulvi Sanaullah, he too avoided the challenge and wrote in his magazine: "As regards Mubahala, only a person who claims that he is from God can issue that challenge. Mirza Tahir Ahmad cannot do that as the one who claimed that he is a prophet from God has met his fate." (Sirat-e-Mustaqeem July, 1988) Thus he contradicted himself. In 1985 he issued a challenge of Mubahala to the Imam of Jamaat Ahmadiyya, and in 1988, when he was given an opportunity to become a party to the Mubahala challenge, he backed out and said that only a Messenger from Allah can issue such a challenge. Moreover he wrote an article, "Qadianis challenge to Mubahala" in which he appealed to Muslims not to take any notice of this challenge. These claims and challenges are "Frauds" and "Tricks". (Sirat-e-Mustaqeem) Then when Allah showed a great sign of the victory of Truth and Zia died as a result of Mubahala, he wrote in the Daily Millat, "To claim that Zia's death was due to Mubahala challenge is ridiculous. Such accidental deaths cannot be acclaimed as a result of Mubahala. The decision of Mubahala was made in 1908." (Daily Millat, 7th September, 1988) Maulana, thus, transgressed to extremes in misleading the public, and therefore became the victim of God's wrath. On 10th of October his car was involved in a crash and he, his son and and mother-in-law, all died on the spot, and his wife, and his younger son had to go the hospital for treatment. Not only that on the day of funeral when all his kith and kin gathered in his house, the floor of the house gave in they fell down into the cellar. The widow who came home from the hospital for the funeral was injured again. The Daily News of Birmingham writes in its 13th October issue: "The grieving widow was caught in a second tragedy yesterday. Mrs. Mahfooza Ahmad 30 was among 100 mourners packed into a room to pay their last respects to her husband when the floor crashed into the cellar." http://www.alislam.org/library/links/00000170.html

View Channel